3; Or, How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Work.
I woke up extra early today to carpool with a couple other people, which was pretty fun I guess, but not waking up early. We got to park at TOH...top of the hill...which is normally reserved for the BigWigs at the Getty...and carpoolers. We felt like real high rollahzzz.
So I arrived at my desk about 20 minutes early after being harangued a couple times from guards at the GRI (Getty Research Institute). Then I realized I didn't have my stupid ITS folder with ALL MY TEMP PASSWORDS. This was definitely bad, and I couldn't help but think it was some sort of payback from yesterday's extensive badmouthing of the ITS experience.
Keeping my cool, I decided to call the help desk and found a lot of complicated things I had to keep in mind--not to mention my unease at talking on the phone so loudly in such a quiet space. Turns out the damn tech's outsourced to Texas and the guy couldn't hear me so I had to talk in my usual Loud American Voice to communicate my problems...basically everybody heard the new worker in the department confessing that he lost his password sheets on the first day and couldn't log on to the network.
This issue remained unresolved until after lunch, because frankly, I didn't want to play phone-tag and pass up the opportunity to start working for realzies with my supervisors.
So I'll spare you the details of my work, because that's not really important, and this part's just supposed to be personal commentary as opposed to a long recitation of events. Blah blah work blah blah computers blah blah acquisition number blah.
While lamenting my inability to log in under my own username, I recieved my first piece of mail which seemed to have gone through at least 10 different people before landing on my lap. It seemed to be a PIN sheet from security services, which I suspect is an authorization to get access to the actual collection without supervisors...I'll have to test to find out.
The whole time I was working I was pondering the different times I could go in and just have a field trip in the chilly little crypt of Art Past. Then Uncle Ben (not the rice dude) walked into my head with those famous words of no-fun heroism: "With Great Power Comes Great Responsibility," heretofore referred to as WGPCGR...not that I'll ever use that again.
Lunch Came and Lunch Went...the 2nd half of the day.
I failed to locate the previously mentioned stalagmites at the Getty, so pictures of those will have to wait. Actually, I don't have a new camera yet, so there.
Walter Benjamin wrote a piece on the status of photography as art that perfectly frames my experiences in the afternoon. He said that art photography makes people want to wash their hands in the restroom reserved for the opposite sex.
Actually, he theorized on the Aura of the art object--the unique art object, such as a painting or sculpture, is an entity unto itself, unique througout all space and time. A singular object.
Since this was also the attribute of early photography such as daguerreotypes, it helped increase the artistic judgment of photography in its early days, but Talbot's very early method of photography already had a reproducible negative.
So the conundrum Benjamin pointed out, in words more eloquent than mine, was that most photography construed as "art" is intrinsically reproducible from the negative the photographer owns or owned. The "original" print doesn't really exist in a sense. The first print, definitely...but 50 prints from the same negative could be made identical to the first, so what would make the first so special really?
I think he pointed out that...wait, I think it was someone else...pointed out that with NY Museum of Modern Art's giant exhibit on Atget helped push the idea of photography as art in an object-sense. Art photography has always (or for a long time at least) occupied the same formal and conceptual space as other mediums but when it came to being an actual art object...unique in every way...it failed, but museums and galleries IMBUED their photography with the Artistic Aura. Now your probably-ununique image of Edward Weston's "Two Shells" can be jacked up in price because they can be marketed like a unique painting!
It's a strange thing, this imbuing of the artistic aura on a medium that's intrinsically clonable.
This long-winded, inaccurately-expressed tour of Bejamin's art theory was a roundabout way of saying that I felt funny in a good way when I got to hold ORIGINAL photographic prints this afternoon. There's something strangely mystifying about the "original" photograph...physically there but different from being physically "there" in a magazine reproduction. The matting, the vault security, the handling instructions...I think all of these contribute to the construction of the artistic aura for photography.
I'm not complaining--it made the experience 100x more enjoyable and awe-inspiring. Then again, this is the experience that keeps museums running even though libraries and the internet ostensibly show the same thing. If anything, I'd rather go to my arts library to see the damn Mona Lisa than go to the actual Louvre to see the disappointingly puny object. But there's still a weird, pleasurable juju around the first prints of an excellent photograph by a master photographer.
Quote of the Day: "MMMMmm...Oh...I could just eat this print."
Things I Learned Today:
-Don't go on Wilshire after 5pm.
-Carpool with people who live close to you.
-Supervisors doing impersonations=funny.
-Work=better than boredom.
-I hope to be the Patron Saint of Curators.
-Learned a lotta shit about computers.
-TOH Parking=bloated sense of superiority, similar to badges
-http://www.getty.edu/art/gettyguide/artObjectDetails?artobj=46151&handle=li THIS, in person, in an original print, is one of the best photographs i've seen in my life.